Commercial litigation is an umbrella term to describe all areas of business-related litigation. There are innumerable reasons why a person or company might find itself in litigation. It is an unavoidable consequence of doing business sometimes. No matter what industry your company is in, there may be employment law issues, contract issues, supplier issues, partnership issues, human rights issues, intellectual property issues, employee theft, improper solicitation of customers, breach of non-competition clauses, etc. Crangle practices in all areas of commercial litigation. You should not have to go to a different lawyer or law firm for each legal issue you or your company may have. An experienced litigation lawyer should be able to do it all. In fact, there is a real benefit to having a lawyer that practices in all areas of commercial litigation. The more areas that a lawyer has knowledge of and been exposed to, the greater he will understand the issues facing the business. Having a broad base of experience and a global understanding of business litigation is a huge benefit to a client. Legal issues can often be interrelated and require both broad and specific legal knowledge.
Companies have trusted Crangle to handle their most highly complex commercial litigation, such as obtaining injunctions to prevent a competitor or departed employee from improperly stealing clients, to a variety of less complex legal matters. Whatever the problem is, Crangle has the knowledge and experience to help you obtain the desired result. Providing value to the client is also something that Crangle takes pride in. You will not be billed for a bunch of junior lawyers, articling students and paralegals that have been working on your case without your knowledge. You will always be informed about what needs to be done in the case, how we are going to get there, and what the expected timeline is. Communicating clearly with the client is just as important to Crangle as communicating clearly to a Judge. After all, if a lawyer cannot communicate clearly with the client, how do you expect them to do so with a Judge?